ActiveCampaignOpen-tracking pixel, click tracking and unsubscribe
Marketing généraliste · ActiveCampaign · vendor's site ↗ · code activecampaign
American platform centered on automation: scenarios triggered by the contact's behavior rather than one-off campaigns. It targets SMEs that have outgrown bulk sending without the budget for an enterprise tool.
Postmetry reference sheet
What the vendor says, checked by us
0 sources · last reviewed on 08/04/2026. Still not checked: Exclusion by campaign, Exclusion by contact, Traceable choice.
Postmetry corpus
What brands actually send
No message from this sending platform has arrived in the corpus yet. This is not a zero: it's an absence of measurement, and nothing is inferred from it.
Postmetry reference sheet
What this ESP allows
Catalog shared by both pages. Each note carries its source, its date, and its confidence level.
On the right, what our emails say about it: matching, contradicted, never observed despite the volume, too few emails to conclude — or out of reach, when the capability can't be read from an email.
Tracking 1 not met · 7 not verified
Unsubscribe 4 not verified
Authentication 5 not verified
Infrastructure & governance 4 not verified
Limits of this analysis
It doesn't say what a brand has actually configured. A sending platform that allows turning off the pixel says nothing about which brands have done so — that's what a brand's report answers.
It doesn't rank. No score, no recommendation: capabilities don't carry the same weight depending on the use, and that weight isn't ours to set.
A “not checked” cell is not a “no”. It says nobody has gone to look yet, and nothing else.
The corpus does not establish a capability. A rate of observed pixels says what brands send, not what the tool can do.
Sources
0 sourcesNo source has been cited for this sending platform yet. Sources are derived from the notes: they will appear as capabilities get documented.
Comparable sending platforms
Compare the whole family →Do your emails go through ActiveCampaign?
The sending platform is read from the headers, not from a claim. The report names it, and says where to fix the findings with that vendor.