SarbacaneOpen-tracking pixel, click tracking and unsubscribe
Européens · Renamed to Positive User (2026) · vendor's site ↗ · code sarbacane
French email marketing platform of the Positive group, based in Hem, near Lille, renamed Positive User in 2026. The new product combines CRM, email marketing, SMS and marketing automation.
Renamed to Positive User (2026). The product and its emails are the same; only the name and the site have changed. The internal code, however, does not move — it's what the measurements already made are attached to.
Postmetry reference sheet
What the vendor says, checked by us
No capability of this sending platform is documented yet. No percentage is shown: it would measure our progress, not what the tool allows.
Postmetry corpus
What brands actually send
No message from this sending platform has arrived in the corpus yet. This is not a zero: it's an absence of measurement, and nothing is inferred from it.
Postmetry reference sheet
What this ESP allows
Catalog shared by both pages. Each note carries its source, its date, and its confidence level.
On the right, what our emails say about it: matching, contradicted, never observed despite the volume, too few emails to conclude — or out of reach, when the capability can't be read from an email.
Tracking 8 not verified
Unsubscribe 4 not verified
Authentication 5 not verified
Infrastructure & governance 4 not verified
Limits of this analysis
It doesn't say what a brand has actually configured. A sending platform that allows turning off the pixel says nothing about which brands have done so — that's what a brand's report answers.
It doesn't rank. No score, no recommendation: capabilities don't carry the same weight depending on the use, and that weight isn't ours to set.
A “not checked” cell is not a “no”. It says nobody has gone to look yet, and nothing else.
The corpus does not establish a capability. A rate of observed pixels says what brands send, not what the tool can do.
Sources
0 sourcesNo source has been cited for this sending platform yet. Sources are derived from the notes: they will appear as capabilities get documented.
Comparable sending platforms
Compare the whole family →Do your emails go through Sarbacane?
The sending platform is read from the headers, not from a claim. The report names it, and says where to fix the findings with that vendor.